Pages

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Teacher’s talk

 Three teachers are talking in the teacher’s office amid their busy schedule of assessing answer sheet of test. Sometimes, teacher’s office is a comfortable place to sell and bargain information on students. This week is the second week of students’ marathon week test. Last week was Examination School Level, and this week is Performance Test. The School Level of Examination test items were prepared by teacher organization of regency level and financially supported by education department.

The test itself does not become the topic of teacher’s talk this very moment. But how the students did the test attracted teacher. The first day went smoothly. The second day, one teacher complained that she found a student who kept answer keys for the test.

The first teacher (T1) said, “ how can I give my students fair score, if the score I got from the test did not represent student’s ability, their mark were similar, the mistake also happened at the same number, the pattern of the answer was just alike”. The second teacher (T2) added, “Mine was worst, all the students paper say nothing on students’ achievements”.  Teacher no.3 said the same thing.

You can imagine, the education department of the regency level had made a great effort to prepare the test and finance the test. It was started by collecting three teachers to design the test item in accordance with the subject given at elementary, junior and senior high school, and vocational school.  The budget must be very huge, even though each of the teacher was only given Rp. 100.000 or about US$ 12 to make three types of test sets. One set cost US$ 4. Set A and B each consist of 50 multiple choice test item, that have to be finished made at a day (start at 7 in the morning and finish at 8 at night). It means US$ 0.08, less than a cent…..What a low price for test developer in this regency. After the teacher finished making the three sets of test, all the sets were given to the committee to be printed and shared to all schools in the entire regency. Again huge budget run to make this to happen. Then, the paper test came to every school. A high school with parallel class, for example 7 classes times 40 student in each class, it needs 280 copied of paper test. If one test consist of 18 pages, can you imagine how many paper needed and how much money needed. One students need 18 pages times 13 subjects is equal to 234 printed pages excluded the cover.  One parallel class needs 234 pages times 280 students or similar to 65.520 pages, if a page is assumed costs Rp. 100, it will consumes Rp. 6.552.000/school. In this regency, high schools are 35, so it needs at least 229.320.000 (two hundred and twenty nine million, three hundred and twenty thousand rupiah!)

 Unfortunately, those entire big steps were slaughtered by the spreading ‘answer key’ around students. Where students got the answer key, they were hard to open their mouth to say any name.  Forget the source of the answer key where it is from; let’s see the negative effects of the answer key to students and teachers.

The first for the students (a) they finished the 2 hours test in 30 minutes! The question is did they read the question before blacken the answer sheet? Or they relied on the answer keys in their hands. The process of learning and assessing did not occur. They did not use their brain. Their brain rest and cause them to be more stupid as they did not cross check the answer key whether it is the right answer key or just a rumbling answer key. (b) Students insult teacher indirectly.  The test items made would be a product of hard work, if a student does the test without reading the test, what kind of student she is. Every words that exist in the test stem and the options of A, B, C, D, or E drain the teacher’s thought. (c) Student thinks that test is not a big thing to do. What they need is money. Using their money they can get the answer key and all the learning process at the class they follow day by day go the trash. Money can buy everything including answer key. Opportunist student can say that school is a place for them to play and leave their routines at home; there is no need to study as for the test without any stay late they get the answer key and period. (d) Student gets addicted with answer key for every test. During school life, student has at least three times of level scale of test, and for those tests they count on answer key. (e) student believes that as long as the test are given in multiple choice, they chance to get answer key is open. (f) Student believes that syndicate answer key seller always directly find them who need the service.

Secondly, for the teacher the answer key (a) paralyze the system of assessment.  When the answers students made are similar any analyze to that answer will come up with ‘misleading analyze result’.  All the options at the test item did not work. Or analyze will say that the questions must be dropped. (b) teacher trusts on test decreasing. How can a teacher believe in test if the answers given by students say nothing unless removing alien’s thought and copy it to their answer sheet. (c) Waste time. Teacher dedicates her time to check students’ answer, every number every sheet, until hundred of sheets. But it turns into wasting time when the answers are relatively use similar pattern of answer. (d) waste of energy. (e) disappointment, (f) another job waits, re-test, means another making of test item, another proctor, another checking answer, another stay late. (f) the worst, teacher consider tests as something a ceremony to be followed without any effect can be taken from it.  

Those three teachers were still talking when I leave them. They are as frustrated as I am who said nothing to their conversation.  I believe that those teachers did nothing to change the fact they were facing. The shortest way can be done, is just ignoring the score they got and gave the score according to the ongoing score available in their assessment book. All the works they did went for nothing.

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Teacher’s Log on Assessing Writing Test

 The students’ work mounted on my desk. They are waiting to be checked. 20/03/2012 was the day for 12 graders have written test. The test was given in two sessions. The first was at 7.30-9.45. the text type that was to be picked: narrative, recount, analytical exposition, hortatory exposition, explanation and discussion.  Meanwhile the topic to be picked: Unified Zone in Indonesia, Social Networking, Being an Idol, Television, Gender Equity.

Science 1 class mostly took Television and Being Idol as their topic of writing. Their choice on discussion text seemed to be a bit a trial of implementing what they have already known into writing practice. I mean, they use similar expression at the opening part of their discussion such as ‘there many conflicting opinion about ….” Followed by “in one hand ….” The third paragraph “ However…” and the closing “ to sum up …”.  There were not significant varieties in their writing to propose argument for and against. When I am reading their works, it was flat. It seems like I can predict what structure I will meet in their writing. It is a bit boring and do not arouse my curiosity to read.  I stressed, almost all students took discussion type, however there is a case. One student picked recount. I guess he made the text from his home. He wrote about Playing Basket Ball. See? His recount on playing basket ball does not have any relation with the topic I provided to choose. I gave him the minimal mark. I had no idea how he could write such a text. I have to ask him why he wrote that.

Further, Science 2 did a bit similar reaction to the text type and topic given. In general I can say that Science 2 did better than Science 1. Some of the students who took Television as their topic put title as “Positive and Negative Effect of Television”. From the title it is clear that the students will see the issue of television from two perspectives. Their positive reasons mostly argued that television give information and cause to feel up to date in information.  Meanwhile as the negative side of watching television is lazy and waste time. Besides Television, some decided to pick Gender Equity. The students’ point of view on this topic was taken from religion side, law, and human basic right. Unfortunately, they did not make any stance; they wrote “gender equity has its own positive and negative side and it depends on how we judge it”.

Then, the session two was at 10.30 to 12.30. Science 3 was given topic of Games, Home Schooling , Cash Aids, and Cheating at the test. Some students choose to write in Analytical Exposition to see Cheating as negative thing. One thing that interests me is that the students point of view on Home Schooling. I get a bit confused how come the students think that home schooling means that invite teacher to homes and teach at home and cause a child who does home schooling will be a loner. One student defines home schooling as study one and one, so that home schooling means a child studies alone. The students’ point of view on home schooling completely based on their thought not from reading. I plan to ask students on this matter whether my prediction is right or not.

Some students who discussed Cash Aids proposed logical reasons and even argued a firm point. They gave a good definition such as Cash aids is a help to poor people in Indonesia in the form of money. The students continued that cash aids are not good because they will make the people lazy and do not want to find a job, besides does not solve the problem of poverty in Indonesia.

The last was Science 4. The result of this class was shocked me. I thought that they could do better than I thought. Most of the students were not able to elaborate their points into clear and complete paragraph. A few students did well. They were the ones who were in ongoing activities were usually active.

What I can learn from this test activity is that ‘teacher must prepare a rubric for assessing the students’ writing’. It will consume a lot of time if teacher does not make a rubric as parameter to score students’ works. It is advisable to categorize the students’ work into “poor, average, good and excellent” group before scoring them to help teacher mis-scored the paper.

It is also helpful if the papers are assessed by two or more teachers. Personal relationship between teacher and student may influence the score. By asking other teacher who does teach at the tested-class will create personal-free scoring and it is hoped fair score can be gained.

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Teaching Log (Discussion Text)

 Teaching log 2

Tahap Building Knoeledge of Field (BKoF)

Pertemuan 2

Kelas XII IA 3 Jam 10.20-11.50

 

Materi yang diajarkan pada pertemuan ini ditujukan agar siswa mampu menangkap ekspresi-ekspresi penting yang digunakan pada teks berbentuk Discussion sehingga kemudian mereka dapat membuat secara mandiri teks berbentuk Discussion.

Untuk itu, Siswa diminta menyimak secara seksama teks berjudul “Is X-Ray Examination Necessary?”

Ketika teks diperdengarkan sebagian siswa ada yang megulang apa yang diucapkan oleh native speaker, ada pulan yang hanya mengulang bagian-bagian tertentu dari teks karena barangkali mereka menganggap intonasi yang digunakan pembicara tidak seperti yang dibayangkannya. Siswa yang lainnya mencoba menyimak dengan diam sambil matanya membaca pada layar LCD.

Seusai teks diperdengarkan, siswa ditanya  “what is the topic of the text about?” Beberapa siswa menjawab dengan yakin “it is about an X-ray.” Saya susul dengan pertanyaan kedua “What is X-ray?” seorang siwa menjawab dengan ragu “It is spectrum light.” Saya tunjukkan kesetujuan saya dengan mengucapkan “Yes, you are right, it is spectrum light. But now think, does an x-ray give advantages or disadvantages to us? “ salah satu siswa menjawab “it gives positive effect” saya Tanya “are you sure? Are you sure that the speaker only mentioned positive sides of using x-ray?” siswa tersebut mengulang jawaban “it gives negative effect” saya tanyan lagi “ are you sure that it gives negative effect?” para siswa saling menatap dengan temannya. Saya katakana “well, it seems to me  that you did not get all the messages proposed by the speaker. Now read the text, find some positive or negative effects of using an x-ray.” Siswa membaca teks. Sebagian siswa mengobrol. Entah apa yang dibicarakan. Saya berdiri dan berkata “baca dengan seksama, kesempatan kamu membaca dan belajar bersama saya tidak akan lama lagi berakhir.” Semua siswa diam, menatap saya. Saya seolah dapat merasakan kegundahan perasaan siswa saya yang sebentar lagi menghadapi UJian Sekolah (US). Tapi saya tidak memperdulikan itu terlalu lama. Saya Tanya lagi siswa “now, can you mention why people agree to use x-ray?” beberapa siswa menjawab. Dan selanjutnya pertanyaan saya dapat dijawab dengan baik oleh siswa.

Saya lanjutkan dengan mengajak siswa melihat ekspresi-ekspresi yang digunakan pada teks discussion. Saya awali dengan mengajak siswa untuk mengingat ekspresi pada naratif. Saya katakan “ in a narrative text, you start your narration by saying ‘once upon a time’. Followed by ‘there was …, and then ‘one day …. “ those are used in narrative. Here in discussion text, locate to the sentence There are many conflicting opinions about the use of X-Rays in a hospital.  Kata conflicting hendak menunjukkan bahwa ada perdebatan di dalam teks ini. Dapatkah kamu menunjukkan apa conflicting opinion pada teks ini? Siswa menjawa “agree and disagree”.

Dengan menggunakan teks sebelumnya yang berjudul “death penalty” saya ajak siswa untuk menemukan ekspresi-ekspresi penting pada teks berbentuk discussion.

Berikut ini adalah yang dicatat oleh siswa berdasarkan analisa terhadap teks X-ray, Death penalty dan Australia should be republic.

Discussion = melihat sebuah isu dari dua sudut pandang atau lebih

Ekspresi awal untuk menunjukkan ada perdebatan pada teks

a)          There are many conflicting opinions about (the use of X-Rays in a hospital) /school uniform/

b)        People have different opinions on the issue of (the capital punishment).

c)         (Australians) have been debating the possibility of becoming (a republic). There are arguments for and against …..

d)        Death penalty has been debating the possibility of becoming new law in Indonesia fro drug dealers.

e)        Introducing a (short work week) may lead to both positive and negative effects on society.

Kata-kata yang terdapat pada dalam kurung dapat diubah sesuai dengan topik yang sedang dibicarakan

Ekspresi untuk menyatakan mendukung pro/setuju/agree/ positive

a)                  60% people agree that ……

b)                  Some think that (death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime.)

c)                  People see that ….

 Ekspresi untuk menunjukkan pergantian cara pandang

a)                  However …..

b)                  On the other hand …..

c)                  Although ..

d)                  Unfortunately …

e)                  Meanwhile (sedangkan)

Eskpresi untuk menunjukkan menentang/against/ cons/ disagree

a)                  There are others who consider (death penalty) as an immoral act

b)                  40% of the patients disagree with the ….

c)                  Those opposed the opinion …

Ekspresi untuk menutup perdebatan

a)            It can be seen that these are reasons for and against (becoming a republic). After looking at both sides I still believe that Australia should become a republic.

b)            The question whether capital punishment is a moral or an immoral act in cultured society, does not have a definite answer ….

c)             Well, as a result of this controversy, many people use traditional health cure to avoid the high cost of hospital care. However, hospitals still insist on having X-Ray examination on patients to get an accurate diagnosis although the cost is very high.

d)   to sum up ….

e)  In conclusion

f)  In summary ….

saya mencontohkan bagaimana ekspresi-ekspresi yang dicatat di atas dapat digunakan ketika hendak membuat teks discussion. saya minta siswa untuk melihat kembali teks Death Penalty dan mencoba menulis ulang teks tersebut ke dalam bentuk paragraf-paragraf teks discussion. saya contohkan, misalnya memulai penyampaian pertentangan dengan menggunakan ekspresi conflicting opinion seperti poin a).

There are many conflicting opinions about death penalty. Death penalty is an act of taking human’s life as a severe punishment for a terrible crime. There are people who support/agree/see that death penalty is accepted.  They proposed at least five reasons. First, …., second,  third,… and then,…. And the last  …. .

 

However, some people disagree because ……

To sum up, death penalty depends on ….

Sebagian siswa mencoba mengikuti penulisn dengan memanfaatkan  ekspresi yang telah dicatat. Masih tertinggal 5 menit lagi untuk bel berbunyi. saya umumkan agar mereka melanjutkan menulis di rumah. gunakan waktu yang tersisa untuk memakai sepatu (saya mengajar di ruang Lab dan siswa tidak diperkenankan memakai sepatu)

Saturday, March 3, 2012

ATHEIS (Tidak BerTuhan)

 Ini, kali kedua saya membaca karya Achdiat Karta Miharja, Atheis. Berpuluh tahun silam buku ini telah dibaca. Tidak dapat dipahami benar isinya. Tetapi bekas-bekas bacaan itu masih ada. Saya masih ingat bagaimana perdebatan batiniah seorang Islam-fanatis berubah menjadi seorang atheis. Secara frontal dan radikal keyakinan fanatis diluruhkan ketika hal-hal mistis dan dogmatis dibuktikan secara fisik dan logis. Berlawanan dengan sedikit yang saya ingat mengenai Atheis,  saya sudah tak ingat lagi siapa nama-nama tokohnya dan alur cerita lengkapnya. Tetapi secara jujur, saya terkagum-kagum dengan nama Achdiat K. Miharja itu sendiri. Puluhan tahun silam pula, saya menemukan salah satu cerpennya yang diterjemahkan menjadi “The Sensation at the Top of the Coconut Tree” (mungkin salah saya menuliskan judul cerpennya). Untuk cerpen ini, saya lebih banyak lupanya, ketimbang ingatnya. Saya hanya ingat cerpen ini mengisahkan lelaki putus asa yang ingin menyelesaikan persoalan kompleks rumahtangganya dengan cara jitu menurut sisi aman dirinya. Dia melakukan protes dengan cara diam di atas pohon kelapa dan menjadi tontonan masyarakat. Cerpen ini disejajarkan dengan karya-karya sastra asing sedunia, mungkin salah satu cerpen Asia yang mendapatkan hadiah Pulitzer. Saya merasa kaget, saya tidak mengira beliau se’mendunia’ itu. Guru sastra (bahasa Indonesia) saya tidak pernah menyinggung kehebatan beliau. Hanya satu nama yang keluar dari mulut guru saya tentang hebatnya ahli sastra Indonesia, yakni Chairil Anwar dengan sajaknya Aku. Berlawanan dengan kehebatan yang ditawarkan guru bahasa Indonesia, saya tidak begitu suka puisi atau hal-hal berbau sastra. Alasan yang membuat saya seperti itu barangkali sedikit sebagai akibat dari guru sastra saya dulu. (Mudah-mudahan tidak jadi menjelekkan) Guru saya selalu mendengung-dengungkan bahwa ‘sastra itu hanya untuk orang-orang dengan budi dan rasa yang tinggi, punya segmen sendiri, ekslusif, bukan untuk orang kebanyakan’. Saya merasa bahwa saya adalah bagian dari orang kebanyakan, maka saya berkesimpulan ‘tidak ada kesempatan bagi ordinary people seperti saya untuk bisa mengenyam indahnya bahasa sastra’. Maka saya pun hampir tidak pernah menyentuh buku-buku bernuansa sastra. Baru setelah saya berusia diatas 25, saya merasa sedikit ada kecemasan terhadap diri saya sendiri. Ada yang beranggapan bahwa ‘memperhalus budi harus dengan bahasa’. Caranya? Saya pun tidak tahu. Kecemasan itu muncul karena selama ini saya tidak pernah membaca buku-buku sastra, jangan-jangan saya tidak berbudi halus.

Maka saya merasa terpanggil untuk membaca buku-buku jadul. Saya cari buku Salah Asuhan, Belenggu, Di Bawah Lindungan Ka’bah, dan buku-buku lainnya, termasuk Atheis. Apakah itu ada kaitannya dengan upaya untuk memperhalus budi, saya pun tidak tahu. Saya hanya mempunyai satu pertanyaan dalam benak ‘masih adakah orang-orang yang membaca buku-buku jadul dan kemudian menjadi halus budi bahasanya seperti pesan guru Bahasa Indonesia saya?’

Selanjutnya, saya mengajukan diri sebagai salah satu orang yang masih mengoleksi dan membaca buku jadul sebagai wujud tanggung jawab terhadap kelestarian terhadap ‘bahasa tinggi’ yang dibuat oleh bangsa Indonesia. Dan mudah-mudahan secara tidak langsung memperhalus budi pula. Perburuan pun dimulai, beberapa buku lusuh terkumpul.

Dari beberapa buku jadul yang dibaca, buku Salah Asuhan, Belenggu, dan Atheis yang memberikan kesan dalam (deep impression) bagi saya. Salah Asuhan tersimpan baik pada file memori saya karena si penulis mampu membuat saya membayangkan hati seorang Ibu yang carut marut menemukan anak impiannya tidak bertindak sesuai dengan norma dan nilai yang berlaku di masyarakatnya. Sedangkan Belenggu mendapat tempat pada cortex, atas alasan bagaimana beratnya berumahtangga ketika suami-istri masing-masing bersikukuh dengan keyakinannya sendiri-sendiri. Dan yang ketiga Atheis karena judulnya terdengar aneh bagi dunia Indoneisa yang selama ini terkenal sangat kental dengan keagamaan.

Buku-buku jadul agak sedikit sulit ditemukan sekarang ini. Nah baru tanggal 2 Maret 2012 saya menemukan buku Atheis. Pas setelah 20 tahun lalu saya membaca buku ini.

Kesan saya terhadap buku ini belum bergeser. Mungkin karena jilid bukunya tidak berganti, masih tetap berwarna hijau dilengkapi dengan hiasan warna merah. Memberikan kesan sama seperti buku yang saya baca 20 tahun lalu. Ketika Atheis sudah ditangan, saya bersemangat sekali untuk kembali membaca buku ini. Muncul pertanyaan dalam benak saya, “Apa yang akan saya rasakan ketika saya membaca ulang buku yang pernah dibaca 20 tahun silam?”

Pada halaman-halaman awal, saya mulai merasakan kehebatan penulis. Bagaimana ia mampu menggambarkan kesedihan seorang perempuan bernama Kartini melalui deskripsi yang cermat dan detail, padahal pada saat yang sama dia juga menggambarkan suasana sekeliling kedukaan yang menyelimutinya. Ada rasa ingin tahu (padahal seharusnya saya harus sudah tahu karena buku ini pernah dibaca dulu) kenapa tokoh Kartini ini, jika mungkin dia ingin menangis berdarah-darah untuk menyampaikan sedihnya pada dunia. Namun, kepenasaran saya terpotong, saya merasa agak sedikit terhalang untuk dengan cepat mengetahui kesedihan Kartini. Penulis memunculkan dirinya sendiri pada bab berikutnya. Tokoh Kartini tercampak sesaat. Penulis memperkenalkan siapa dirinya secara tidak langsung dan menyampaikan bagaimana kisah ini bisa sampai kepada pembaca. Saya tidak terlalu menyukai bagian ini. Munculnya bagian ini memberikan kesan pemenggalan bagi mengalirnya imajinasi pembaca yang sudah terbentuk dengan baik.

Ketidakpuasan itu tidak dibiarkan lama, penulis menunjukkan bagaimana dia mampu membawa kembali pikiran pembaca kepada topik yang sedang disuguhkan. Pembaca tenggelam menelusuri siapa tokoh utama pada Atheis, Hasan. Bagaimana Hasan mengahabiskan masa kanak-kanaknya, remaja dan bagaimana dia mengisi kekosongan batiniahnya dengan cara melabuhkan dirinya pada pemahaman mengenai sareat, hakekat dan tarekat. Bagian akhir inilah yang mengombang-ambingkan perasaan pembaca mengenai fakta beragama. Penulis dengan jelas menggambarkan bagaimana hidup umum masayarakat pada masa penjajahan lengkap dengan kasta-kastanya dan etika-etika feodalismenya. Lebih rinci lagi, melalui pemindahan tahapan beragama tokoh Hasan dari beragama orang kebanyakan menjadi penganut tarekat dan mempunyai guru. Pembaca diajak untuk mengkaji bagaimana kepuasan vertikal-spiritual dan hubungan makhluk-khaliq tercipta. Penulis menyebutnya ‘jalan pintas’ beroleh kepuasan illahiah dimana orang kebanyakan tidak akan pernah mencicipinya.

Panta rei  begitu penulis memperkenalkan hidup. Hidup digambarkan sebagai sesuatu yang tidak statis tetapi mengalir bagaikan air diwakilkan kepada tokoh Hasan. Hasan mengalami perubahan hidup-dari seorang klerk (pegawai biasa) dengan kehidupan biasa (= bekerja, beribadah, berpikir bahwa hidup di dunia adalah bekal untuk hidup akhirat) menjadi seseorang yang dalam pandangannya menjadi seorang yang ‘hidup’ karena bertemu teman lamanya Rusli. Rusli adalah seorang berpengalaman luas, meng-internasional, dan menentang  kasta-kasta serta mempropagandakan kesejajaran. Itu anggapan Hasan terhadap Rusli. Selain itu, pengubah kehidupan Hasan sebetulnya dari ‘adik Rusli’ yakni Kartini. Bagi Hasan, Kartini adalah jelmaan ‘almarhum’ Rukmini kekasihnya dulu, pembeda keduanya hanyalah tahi lalat di atas bibirnya saja. Pertemuan Hasan-Rusli-Kartini membuka mata pembaca bagaimana pandangan ortodox bertemu dengan pandangan modern, non gender, serta bagaimana pertentangan pandangan timur-barat disajikan secara lugas.

Pandangan Timur yang diwakili tokoh Hasan yang menganggap bahwa laki-perempuan ada batas jelas yakni muhrim-non muhrim. Selain itu, perempuan tidak merokok, dilindungi, bergantung kepada lelaki, dan tidak berdaya (bahkan tidak punya pendapat). Keyakinan ketimuran ini ditentang habis oleh tokoh Kartini. Dia mewakili ‘manusia merdeka’ ala barat. Segala tingkahnya sangat mengejutkan Hasan. Cita rasa musik Kartini yang kebarat-baratan bahkan dia bisa bermain piano sangat mencengangkan Hasan. Hasan sendiri sebagai lelaki hampir tidak tahu musik-musik barat selain shalawat-shalawat dan puji-pujian yang didendangkannya sebelum mengaji. Hasan semakin kelimpungan ketika Kartini dan ‘abangnya’ Rusli pergi berduaan menonton film. Bagi Hasan, batas muhrim-non muhrim telah dilanggar, bisa saja Hasan menganggap bahwa Rusli dan Kartini adalah kafir. Mereka berdua terlalu berani, terlalu  proletar, tidak takut akhirat dan dosa.

Penulis memuaskan pembaca dengan menyampaikan peliknya rasa cinta, benci, kesal, marah dan segala emosi yang dialami Hasan kepada Kartini. Selain itu, penulis juga secara cerdik mampu menyampaikan ‘joke’ kelucuan dengan caranya. Pembaca akan tersenyum ketika penulis meringankan pikiran pembaca dengan joke-joke yang dibuat sedemikian rupa sehingga tidak terasa bahwa joke itulah sesungguhnya yang membuat pembaca tidak ingin melepaskan buku ini sebelum tamat. Kepuasan lain akan dirasakan pembaca ketika bagaimana penulis mengaduk-aduk perasaan pembaca yang terbiasa dengan pemikiran fanatik Islam dikontraskan dengan logika. Menawarkan Tuhan dalam bentuk lain dan nama lain bukanlah hal mudah. Perlu keluasan pengetahuan untuk bisa memaparkan Tuhan dan keyakinan (belief) secara berkesinambungan seperti yang dilakukan penulis. Misalnya saja memperkenalkan Tuhan dengan nama Allah, ke dalam nama lain misalnya Kristus dan Yahwe dibumbui dengan alasan logis kenapa manusia bertuhan dan pemikiran bagaimana Tuhan itu muncul sebagai jawaban atas carut marutnya kehidupan dunia (diantaranya ketidakberesan pranata sosial dan struktur pemerintahan) dan ketidakberdayaan manusia.

Semakin jauh pembaca mengikuti kemana tokoh Hasan membawa keyakinannya, semakin jauh pula pikiran pembaca dicerdaskan penulis. Secara tersirat penulis memasukkan filsafat kedalam perbincangan tokoh-tokohnya. Urusan pelik filsafat seperti apa itu hakikat hidup diajukan. Serta bagaimana teori alam sadar (Consciousness) dan alam bawah sadar (sub-consciousness) diuraikan dalam dialog yang ringan. Secara logis penulis menguraikan bagaimana teori Sigmund Freud  bekerja pada otak manusia. Untuk pembaca yang belum mengenal filsafat dan dunia tarekat, penjelasan ini akan sedikit membingungkan. Tetapi, penulis memberikan peluang kepada pembaca non akademis untuk memahami filsafat dengan memberikan gambaran sederhana bagaimana alam bawah sadar mempengaruhi alam sadar karena kerja otak terganggu misalnya karena sakit atau tidur.

Sejalan dengan penelusuran tokoh Hasan, pembaca yang berasal dari suku Sunda akan merasakan sekali bagaimana kentalnya ke’Sunda’an pada gaya penulisan Atheis. Banyak kata-kata Sunda yang langsung diserap. Walaupun nuansa ke’Sunda’annya kental, bukan berarti pembaca dari non-suku Sunda akan menemui kesulitan memahami buku ini. Secara seimbang buku ini memaparkan budaya, masyarakat, nilai, norma, serta hukum yang berlaku pada masa penjajahan. Istilah-istilah yang berkaitan dengan tata cara bertamu, berpakaian, dan bermasyarakat tergambar dengan baik. Bagi pembaca yang lahir setelah jaman kemerdekaan akan bisa merasakan kehebatan pengaruh feodal dalam masyarakat melalui paparan penulis. Selain itu, kemampuan berbahasa penulis ikut pula menghiasi dialog tokoh. Sesekali tokoh menggunakan bahasa Belanda, di lain kesempatan menggunakan bahasa Inggris.  Penggunaan berbagai bahasa ini meyakinkan pembaca bahwa penulis benar-benar seorang multibahasawan.

Sedikit bertentangan dengan kehebatan penulis, secara pribadi, saya sebagai pembaca merasa sedikit kecewa. Tokoh Hasan pada akhir cerita menemui ajal secara tragis. Kondisi ini mengingatkan pembaca kepada keyakinan yang dianut budaya Indonesia, yakni orang baik akan menemui bahagia dan orang jahat akan mengalami hal sebaliknya. Keadaan ini berlaku pada tokoh Hasan. Berlawanan dengan cara pandang penulis yang memandang jauh kepada ratusan tahun yang akan datang dalam hal mengobrak-abrik keyakinan akan hal-hal gaib, jin, termasuk Mbah Jambrong, tuturan akhir cerita seolah tidak berani beranjak dari kesepakatan umum tidak tertulis masyarakat Indonesia, yaitu tokoh jahat harus mendapatkan hukuman yang setimpal.

Saya dengar buku ini diwajibkan dibaca oleh siswa SMA. Sebersit rasa prihatin muncul dalam hati. Saya membayangkan siswa SMA yang diminta membaca buku ini akan mengulang kegagalan saya dalam membaca. Saya yakin, beberapa siswa SMA belum memiliki background knowledge (latar belakang pengetahuan) yang cukup untuk bisa menghubungkan dunianya dengan dunia imajiner yang ditawarkan penulis. Selain itu, siswa SMA akan frustasi jika diminta membaca buku ini. Selain bahasanya jadul, banyak pula menggunakan istilah-istilah jadul seperti pokrol bambu. Mungkin kata bambu tidak asing bagi siswa SMA, tetapi istilah pokrol bambu? Niatan guru untuk menumbuhkan minat baca pada siswa SMA akan layu jika menganggap buku ini sebagai salah satu sumber bahan bacaan wajib. Buku ini lebih cocok diberikan untuk memperkaya jenis bacaan siswa, bukan untuk menumbuhkan minat baca siswa. Siswa tidak akan merasa ‘senang’ ketika membaca buku ini karena selain isi buku ini ‘terasa berat’ saat mengharubirukan masalah keyakinan beragama juga tingkat literacy (melek) pengetahuan pada buku ini tidak mudah dicerna oleh beberapa siswa SMA yang belum mengenal filsafat dan tarekat.

Sebelum saya akhiri, saya dapat mengatakan bahwa buku Atheis mampu menambah kekayaan intelektual pembaca yang memiliki background knowledge yang cukup untuk menjembataninya. Selain itu, Achdiat Karta Miharja memperkenalkan budaya dan cara pandang feodal lewat tulisannya. Untuk itu, pembaca akan mengenal struktur dan pranata sosial yang dilakoninya sekarang secara lebih baik,  jika mengetahui tatanan yang berlaku sebelumnya. Selamat membaca.

Chaos amongst teachers

 By 2013 all Indonesian teachers should become certified teacher. The government prepares a program to help teachers be certified and then admitted as professional teacher just as another professional worker do such as doctor and lawyer. The first I heard, to be certified, a teacher must study a year to get extra education and after that she becomes professional teacher. Unluckily, the program is only provided for those who have titles as ‘teacher model’. And it is only six teachers a year who can be teacher model in regency level. I heard no more about this program. A few years ago I met a teacher who claimed himself had graduated from joining professional program somewhere in Central Java for a year and he is a certified teacher now. He mentioned that the program was aimed only for Junior High school teacher. What a program!

Actually before that, I also heard that there was a teacher certification selection, but only for Principals. And my Principal was one of them. He secretly told me that he needed many kinds of certification paper and document to collect. He asked me whether he could borrow my certificates and I nodded. It was around 2006. A year from that moment I hear that he got double salary. His fake paper submission was not found by anyone.

That year I moved my work from SMP to SMA. All matter about certification program was not my focus at that time. My attention was on myself who become the eye spot in my new workplace. However, I saw some of the elderly teachers began to collect some papers to register themselves to be certified teachers. Many documents they collected, some were originals, but some others are fakes. Even the worst, there were some smart people who took advantage from the certification preparation condition. They claimed that were capable of issuing some documents to support the certification papers. And as we could guess, teachers were like ants seeing sugar; they bought the paper at any cost forgetting it was illegal.

I tried registered myself to be a certified teacher. I had a good reason for that. I was one of the model teachers, and I heard that model teacher as a rare kind of teacher may get a better attention from the government, and they may have a seat to register earlier than ordinary teacher.  I unfortunately, it was not as was as I thought. Many obstacles that stopped me to be earlier certified teacher. There were some people who did not have sincere heart to see other move forward and get better future. These kinds of people will be happy if they can block others’ dream. And it happened to me. All chances that had stood in my very eyes had gone, because I had a man in charge who hated to see his colleague get comfort life. I felt very sad that I should face a man who had no heart to make others one step ahead before his. Perhaps this bad attitude related to his naïf ego. Or he wanted to make revenge. I heard that his daughter is not registered teacher yet, here unregistered teacher is called honorarium teacher (HT). He did a very unreasonable thing to bring success for his daughter in certification program. He made fake paper mentioned that his daughter had done some extra curricular guide activities. In my point of view, the papers he made were way too far from logical basis. It would be very impossible for an honorarium teacher to carry such an important duty at school exceeding the registered teacher. He found out later that his daughter failed and it of course broke his daughter’s heart. I can make a rough conclusion; her misfortune occurred because of his father’s greedy and blind hearted action.  The right to submit the certification-paper should go to me but the chances was given to his daughter and blocks my way to certified teacher. From this point, God   is always just and fair. I get my list at last.

In 2009, I submitted my certification-paper. It is called ‘portfolio’. The paper consisted of basic data of my teaching records. There were ten parts that I had to fulfill to get certified license issued. Every teacher was gone crazy fulfilling these ten parts. All were busy. I learned bit by bit what to collect in each part. The first was the paper that relate to formal data that stated I am a registered teacher proved by an issued paper from Education Department. The second was about certificates that show my experiences following teacher activities such as workshop, seminar, or in house training program (IHT). I submitted what I had without copying other’s certificates.  The third was my product during teaching such as book and research. I enclosed two of my research papers and a book. The fourth, the papers depicted my involvement in supporting students’ talents. I put some papers in this part. I always become the coach for debating championship every year. I found out, some of my friends created some paper as if they had done the coaching for some activities. Another lies legalized in the name of certified teacher. I could only smile to see this. I could not involve in such a fake activity since I believed putting the data based on the real ones would save me. I could understand other who enclosed fake papers. They almost never joined any activities inside or outside the school and the reasons for that are they were busy teaching. The illogical thing that my friends did was taking picture a trophy, and they mentioned if the trophy was obtained because of their work. How could this happen, no one could explain it. The fifth, we had to enclose our best lesson plans taken from the last five semesters. Again, my friends got mad. A said the lesson plan should look like this, meanwhile B said that the lesson plan should look like that. I did not follow what they assumed, I made like what I used to make. The sixth, I enclosed the teaching aids. This part a bit hard as I have to collect my memories on what I had used to help my teaching worked well. Many teaching aids I had made in the last five years. One by one I made a replica of my teaching aids. I was busy for that, on the other hand, my friends were busier. They created teaching aids based on their version.  The seventh, the paper mentioned that teacher had joined academic activities such as become a key note on a seminar. This part became the hardest one for teachers. I could say that because it was not easy for teacher to be a keynote in a seminar. It was not because the seminar was rarely held in school level, but the teachers always refuse to be the keynote. They admitted that to be the audience of a seminar or an IHT was a burden, and to be a keynote become doubled-burden. This idea sound weird but it spread well around teachers.

While the teachers were busy preparing the paper to become the portfolio. Some took advantage form this situation. Take an example, a supervisor did unexplainable thing like asking some money to be paid to him just to pay his signature. Imagine, if one signature cost ten thousand rupiah and there were hundreds of teachers doing portfolio, what easy money it was. In fact, the supervisor did nothing to the portfolio making. I was asked to collect two hundred and fifty thousand rupiah to pay ‘whose name can’t be mentioned’ in the process of making portfolio. Teachers spent a great sum of money when doing portfolio. My friend confessed that she paid two to three million to make her portfolio done. She argued that it was better paid two or three million rupiah rather than she went to PLPG (it is a kind of teacher training to improve teaching and professional competences). She added that joining PLPG was scary her to death. PLPG took a month to join and many activities there exhaust teacher physically and mentally. Physically meant that they have to sit in the classroom and study again and again about teaching method, teaching philosophy, curriculum, lesson plan, teaching aids, and many other courses that they considered as tiring. Mentally, every course was ended by test. The test was another point that they did not like, they were afraid of fail in the test. To pass the test it needed a lot of reading, taking notes, discussion, change mind set, and so on and so forth activities that they avoid even though they are teachers.

I remembered that I was given less than a month to finish the portfolio. When the portfolio was done, crazy things come up. It was a big question on how to bind all of the document s. some teachers collected hundreds pages of paper, it reached about 10cm in height of the paper thickness.  My paper was categorized the thinnest one. Thanks to my creative husband who created an effective and reasonable way to bind the document without damaging the document. Since he could bind without any cutting, punching, or any actions that caused the paper tear. While others have to accept with annoyed that some of their document were punched or got smaller in size because of the lack of knowledge or experience of cover maker (tukang jilid).  My portfolio submitted in the most elegant look (100% my personal opinion).

In the regency level chaotic also emerged. Elementary School Teachers (EST) were the worst. Each of them was asked to collect five hundred thousand rupiah for nothing (perhaps similar to my two hundred and fifty thousand collections). I heard also the unpleasant things that EST faced, they were asked to pay fifty thousand rupiah in each and every meeting held. Luckily it did not happen to me who teaches at Senior High School (SHS).  For EST, they did not complain for any wild donation in form of money. They confessed that every time they got money from the government, their supervisor cut some of their income without their permission. Perhaps this did not happen in regency. I believe that each regent has its own regulation on teachers. What happened in my school is almost the same. When I got some money for example the 13th salary that is usually given around July, the administration staff will cut that money (under teacher’s permission, that’s better). The reason for that is to share the happiness with the school members. The contradiction occurs when administration staffs get some money, they never inform teacher and they refuse to share their income with teacher.

Besides those chaotic there was uncertainty on what next. After the binding document processed was done. All documents from each teacher (each collected 2 bundle of documents) should be sent to the local regency level with some form to fill. I thought the people at local regency level were ready to welcome our bundles of document. They looked like very confused with the documents. They said this and that all of which made us-teachers- got more nervous. I leaved all the documents. The only thing I could do just pray. Pray that my documents were safe and assessed by the right person. I also prayed that the assessor could see fake documents and the original ones.

Further, worried also spread everywhere. All were afraid of being failed.  I waited and waited. I heard that my documents were assessed in UNPAS (Universitas Pasundan, Bandung), the others were at UPI (Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung). The weird thing happened to me. I got a text (sms) informed me to collect some data and sent to the sender. The data was my certification number, my bank account number and other important numbers. I got curious why this people asked me such an important numbers. The sender claimed himself from UNPAS. If this man was really from UNPAS and needed my data why didn’t he send a letter to Dinas (regional education department office) so that I would believe easily and did what he asked for.  In fact, it was really from UNPAS, a friend of mine confirmed the text. This is very Indonesia. Asking crucial data through text!

I submitted the data asked by UNPAS.  Then I was informed that my portfolio was succeeded to escort me to be a certified teacher and the certificate would be given on Sunday at UNSUR (Universitas Suryakancana, Cianjur). Some were sad as their portfolio failed to be group as qualified enough and perhaps convincing enough.  On the day of certificate would be given to me, I went to UNSUR by myself. Again chaotic condition occurred. The committee was unwell prepared. There was thousands teachers from EST to SHS teachers. When I arrived, the ceremony (I called it ceremony since there was some people looked like VIP people from Dinas holding a mike and talked to audience). I stayed outside the building. There were hundreds people still outside. They asked this and that but no one could give sufficient answer. They said that there was a map on the wall showing the room to visit for each teacher. I tried to find my name. I found it. it was mentioned that I should visit room no…something. I went to that room. The funny thing that I felt at that time was that how people could make a map describing places and room but without mentioning which one is south or west or east, or at least an arrow showing where you were standing at that very moment. The more I looked at the map, the more confusion I got.  Finally after asking here and there I found the room. It was around December 2010. I could remember the month since it was the time when my mother died. I met one of my friends, she is Ms. WWH. I considered her as a close friend. I said that for three reasons.  First, we unite at the same professional group and we always work hand in hand to make significant progress in our union. Secondly, we had just finished a report, and she came to my house many times. And the last, I thought she considered me as her close fried.  What I considered about my friend who I thought my close one was 100% wrong. How I could say that. I had a good reason for that. I was at my grief and mourning moment after loosing my mother, she knew it. You know, she said nothing to show her sympathy and condolence for mother’s death. I was so shocked. I was shocked with my own hope. I hoped that she would come to me and said ‘I am so sorry to hear about your mother’. Those words never burst from her mouth. This caused me sadder and sadder. I kept my self silent. I got doubled sadness that day. It was endless sadness as I had no mother and father anymore and at the same time it was added by her ignorant for my late mother.

Forget the sadness I should swallow all by myself. I got my certificate. I heard that I have to collect another paper to make the certification salary adjustment went to my account.  Then, annoyed information came. All teachers have to collect the papers once more, as the first one was not enough (I bet it was lost, because careless was seen anywhere). The worst, took almost a year since got the certificate, my friend was totally lost his paper and got certified money then. He went to Jakarta to check where the papers go. The Jakarta’s people convinced him that they had sent him the money. Where the money goes, asked the people at the local regency.  He almost desperate and lost his hope to get his certified money, but a year from that he got his money. So where they money stayed all these years?

After a year I got my certificate, I got the money too. However, it went to UPI. I had made a promise, to make myself a professional teacher I have to continue studying. I believe that continue studying is the only option to make myself appropriate to be categorized as certified teacher. My friends said that I was too idealist. They said ‘just pick any university, pay thirty to fifty million rupiah then in nine months the master degree diploma is in hand. What a university and what a nonsense decision! But I did not choose that. I did not agree with fake university who sold degree and diplomas. I chose a real one and joined a regular class. Although it was very tired and made me almost crazy and gave up as the expectation of my Professors were very high on under graduate students. I studied day by day. I tried my best to enable my competences raise.  My friends who took short cut-university type laughed my stubborn idea and let myself dying fulfilling tasks and submitting endless research based papers.

The certified-salary hoped to raise the welfare of teachers and it did. Some teachers now sitting behind wheel and drive to school.  Luxurious life perhaps gets closer to some teachers. Unluckily the teaching dedication and loyalty does not run as fast as the car they are driving.  I saw some teachers’ dedication and loyalty decreasing. Perhaps, the more money they get the more needs wait.

As soon as the money transferred into the teachers’ account I thought I can rest now. I am totally wrong. Last week, through text I had information that I have to collect some papers (again) to get my certified-money run.  I asked myself ‘where did my last collected-papers do?’  Every year I collect the similar papers to similar institution to get similar service. What does this mean?  But, as other, I could do nothing. I collected some papers again and again perhaps next year!

The latest issue I heard on teacher-certification program was that there was a preliminary test called UKA (Ujian Kompetensi Awal?). UKA caused chaotic happens again amongst teachers. I heard that Elementary School teacher paid 50 thousand rupiahs to get ‘a leak item test’. And then when they were gathered in teacher association building, again, they were asked for 30 thousand rupiahs. They collector argued that the money to pay the answer key that might come at night. Imagine 30 thousand times one thousand teachers. What money! The money itself perhaps did not matter to be collected. But the reason for collecting the money does matter.  The money was collected to buy the answer key. How could teachers do this? They cheated, they lied to pass UKA. All the efforts the government held went for nothing as cheating accompany the process.

I pray that the teachers can become role model for their students. When character and mind sent is thought at school it depicts that this nation had lost its character and misleading in stating mind set.

Jurnal 1 Tahap 1 BKoF teaching Discussion Text

 Walaupun kepala terasa “bejad” atau pecah karena migren yang luar biasa diakibatkan dua hal. Pertama secara fisik mata saya bengkak karena iritasi berat akibat mata terkena angin ketika naik motor Cianjur-Bandung. Kedua karena efek Sidang Proposal yang memicu mencret pertanda stress. Proposalnya dikecam abis-abisan. Penguji 1 support dengan menyebutkan ‘ya bisa dilanjutkan’, tapi tanpa menyentuh proposalnya, Penguji ke 2 mengkritik dari sana sini, sampai harus ganti judul, tambah lagi bagian Kajian Pustakanya, intinya banyak kurangnya. Penguji 3, tidak berkomentar apapun, selain meminta menunggu dari jam 9 pagi dan baru diterima sama beliau jam 4 sore!

Sekembalinya dari kampus, saya kembali pada dunia kerja. Setumpuk rencana menunggu, dan semuanya menjadi ekstra beban. Life.

Saya masuk kelas untuk mengisi jam ke 1-2, seperti yang tercatat pada agenda ngajar,hari itu siswa harus melakukan tes speaking untuk materi Review (resensi) film. Para siswa seliweran memberikan laporan lewat sms menyatakan tidak siap. Saya katakan lewat sms (juga) bahwa tidak apa-apa tesnya tidak dilakukan hari ini. Tapi, entah bagaimana, beberapa siswa maju untuk tes hari itu. Saya memuji keberanian mereka berbicara di depan kelas antara 3 sampai 5 menit. Bercucuran keringat mereka terbata-bata menyampaikan sinopsis dan evaluative summation film. Sebagian dapat saya pahami bahasa Inggrisnya sebagian lagi tidak dapat saya kenali, mungkin karena siswa tersebut menggunakan terjemah google. Dugaan saya tidak terlalu melenceng karena si pelaku dengan tersenyum mengiyakan. Teknologi kadang menyesatkan.

Tetapi, ada beberapa siswa yang menunjukkan unjuk kerja yang sangat baik. Ketika lupa, dia berimprovisasi sehingga performa lisannnya tidak terganggu. Yang masih mengganggu hanyalah ‘pronunciation’ atau cara pengucapan. Beberapa kata yang tertangkap masih salah diucapkan dua  diantaranya “evil /ivil/, fugitive /fugitif/.

Pada kelas berikutnya, jam mengajar ke 3-4, saya merasa lebih sakit di kepala, belum lagi ada tugas agar para guru harus mengumpulkan data-data untuk kebutuhan sertifikasi. Pada suratnya tertera pemberkasan untuk para guru periode 2011, tetapi diterjemahkan untuk guru periode 2007 sampai 2011. Saya merasa pusing sendiri, kenapa surat dari dinas sangat multitafsir. Jangan-jangan para guru di sekolah saya yang salah terjemah. Semula saya merasa tidak harus mengumpulkan pemberkasan, tetapi karena semua orang babak belur melakukannya, saya merasa terpanggil secara moral untuk turut serta ^_^.  Seorang guru mengorbankan dirinya sendiri untuk berangkat ke Bandung menuju UNPAS untuk melegalisir Sertifikat Pendidik yang dikeluarkan dari UNPAS. Sementara, mereka yang memegang sertifikat pendidik yang dikeluarkan dari UPI, pun, menghambakan dirinya pada surat dari dinas dan berangkat ke Bandung untuk dapat legalisisr. Saya melihat kejadian ini dengan miris. Para guru penuh kegugupan mengisi formulir, memfoto kopi ini itu, menandatangankan ini itu. Belum termasuk insiden konyol karena salah orang yang menanda tangan. Katanya salah satu SK harus ditandatangani oleh Pengawas Sekolah. Alkisah semua SK ditandatangan sang Pengawas. Esok harinya ada berita duka, kita salah tunjuk pengawas. Yang berhak menanda tangn SK-SK kita pengawas Z bukan pengawas X yang kemarin. Menandatangannya mungkin tidak jadi masalah. Yang menjadi masalah adalah ‘dana tanda tangnnya!” We can say we bribe the Supervisor just to get his signature. A wild rule from nowhere that corners us into chaotic educational life. Saya hanya bisa cengar-cengir ketika kita semua harus memfotokopi-ulangkan SK dan kembali ditandatangan-ulangkan. Ditutup dengan membayar-ulang!! Life.

So, saya tidak mengajar pada jam ke 3-4. Saya yakin para siswa bahagia dengan ketidakhadiran saya. Mereka akan blingsatan pergi ke kantin, berbaris-baris di depan Mang Oneng atau Mang Ojo, atau mungkin Teh Beti. Mereka akan membawa kantong-kantong plastik berisi jajanan dan makan di dalam kelas sambil menggosipkan betapa menderitanya mereka sebagai siswa SMA. Mereka akan mengeluhkan tugas Fisika yang seolah tidak ada hentinya. Mengkritik beratnya tugas Sinematografi. Menarik nafas untuk tidak adilnya tugas Agama. Membahas guru yang pilih-pilih perhatian. Menyindir anehnya guru yang hanya menceritakan keluarganya, anaknya, hapenya, perjalanannya, dan seabrek never ending story lainnya. Jika saja saya bisa mendengar semuanya, maka saya akan diuntungkan oleh situasi ini. How? Saya akan mampu melihat ‘kesenjangan Silabus dan praktek mengajar’. Hampir terlewat, apakah sayapun termasuk yang digosipkan? Pasti. Apa yang mereka gosipkan? Banyak. Tapi saya tidak akan membahas itu sekarang.

Jam ke 5-6 saya sedikit mendapatkan tenaga, selain selama 90 menit sebelumnya saya hanya bolak balik ke kantor TU buat ngurus pemberkasan, kebetulan saya bisa ngutang ke kantin untuk beli nasi kuning bungkus dan karoket. Saya makan sambil menyimak gosipan para guru menyoal betapa Dinas merepotkan guru. Mereka bertanya-tanya untuk apa para guru mengumpulan SK-SK, kopi buku rekening, NPWP. Bukankah tahun lalu sudah mengumpulkannya. Bahkan tahun-tahun sebelumnya juga melakukan hal sama. Dimanakah berkas-berkas itu berada? Apa mereka tidak mengubah data hard kopi itu ke dalam soft kopi. Toh yang diupload hanya data nama guru, NIP, nonor rekening, nomor sertifikat pendidik. Sepertinya tidak akan memakan 1.000 giga. Ataukah secara tidak langsung kita boleh menyimpulkan bahwa Dinas Pendidikan sedang sakit?

Saya menyuap setiap nasi butir nasi kuning dengan sendok plastik sementara telinga terbuka lebar menyerap setiap kata dari teman-teman sekantor. Ritual makan ala kantor telah selesai, saya mendapat sedikit energi, ya cukuplah buat ngajar anak SMA mah.

Saya mulai mengajar dengan mengatakan saya hendak berbagi pengalaman ketika saya menghadapi ujian. Saya berkata ,”I will share my experience when l was facing a test yesterday. While you are listening, you must find out the topic or the issue that l am delivering. Don’t forget to take a note what advantages and disadvantages you heard”. Para siswa mendengarkan dengan seksama saya menyampaikan isu tes. Dalam Bahasa Inggris saya uraikan bahwa tes memiliki dua sisi. Sis positif dari adanya tes diantaranya membantu siswa mengetahui kemampuannya. Sedangkan bagi orang tua, hasil tes dapat dijadikan sumber informasi untuk mengetahui kemajuan pendidikan anaknya. Dan untuk lembaga, hasil tes bisa dijadikan tolak ukur sejauh mana visi misi sekolah tercapai secara akademis. Selain hal-hal positif yang disebutkan tadi, tes atau ujian memiliki kemudharatan. Misalnya saja bagi siswa, tes mengakibatkan siswa stress. Mereka akan merasa tertekan karena membayangkan tes yang akan datang. Selain itu, siswa juga berada pada posisi yang tidak diuntungkan jika berhadapan dengan guru yang tidak bertanggung jawab. Guru yang memanfaatkan tes untuk menutupi kekurangan dirinya yang tidak siap mengajar. Guru jenis ini cenderung memberikan tes untuk materi yang belum yang diajarkan. Atau yang lebih parah, memberikan tes agar dia tidak harus memberikan layanan pendidikan.

Saya lihat para siswa mampu menangkap dengan baik apa yang saya sampaikan. Beberapa siswa bahkan mampu menulis-ulangkan apa yang saya sampaikan dalam bahasa Inggris. Saya minta siswa menyebutkan apa manfaat tes dan apa kerugian dari tes. Berebutan siswa mengacungkan tangan untuk berkontribusi memberikan jawaban. Great! Selanjutnya saya mengajak siswa untuk melihat isu Aborsi. Saya menantang agar para siswa mampu menunjukkan sisi positif dan negarif dari aborsi dalam waktu 10 menit. Untuk kemudahan, saya perkenankan mereka menulis dalam bentuk poin-poin saja dan menggunakan bahasa Indonesia. Saya lihat mereka memeras otak dan berusaha menyampaikan pendapat terbaik mereka. Poin-poin yang mereka buat antara positif dan negatif, cenderung lebih banyak sisi negatifnya. Hal serupa terjadi di kelas selanjutnya ketika saya mengajar pada jam pelajaran ke 7-8. Jika boleh saya men-generalisir, poin-poin pendapat kedua kelas ini tidak jauh berbeda. Menandakan cara pandang terhadap isu ini kurang lebih dilihat dengan cara yang sama.

Pandangan yang mereka ajukan dimulai dari sudut agama. Dosa. Setelah itu mereka baru mengajukan dari sisi lain atas tindakan aborsi. Saya tersenyum kecut ketika mereka menulis bahwa sisi positif dari aborsi adalah “menyelamatkan nama baik keluarga”. Saya jelaskan kepada siswa bahwa jika menyelematkan nama baik keluarga dengan cara aborsi, itu sama maknanya dengan mendukung aborsi. Sikap mendukung aborsi bertentangan dengan keyakinan bahwa melakukan aborsi itu dosa. Kontradiksi pegajuan argumen akan menyusahkan pada tahap elaborasi argumen ke depan. Sisi positif lain yang diajukan siswa dan membuat saya tersenyum adalah ‘aborsi dapat membuat lapangan kerja baru; aborsi dapat menyelamatkan masa depan-maksudnya menyelamatkan masa depan anak yang hamil sebelum nikah= dengan cara mengaborsi bayinya’. Saya sampaikan kepada siswa saya bahwa cara pikir seperti itu menyesatkan. Pertama, kita tidak bisa mendukung tindakan aborsi, kedua negara menganut keyakinan bahwa aborsi tidak legal. Sebagai warga negara yang baik, maka dianjurkan untuk mendukung apa yang diyakini secara nasional.

Saya katakan, kita harus menentukan terlebih dahulu apa definisi bayi. Jika kita mengambil alasan agama, janin dianggap sebagai manusia utuh seteleh ruh ditiupkan ke dalam janin yakni ketika bayi berusia empat bulan. Jika kita punya anggapan empat bulan baru disebut bayi, hati-hati, nanti menggugurkan kandungan saat bayi berusia dibawah empat bulan artinya boleh. Dengan alasan mereka belum jadi manusia. Atau kalau menganggap bahwa bayi itu dianggap manusia semenjak terjadi pembuahan, maka saat 1 hari pun setelah terjadi pembuahan, si lbu dianggap telah membawa manusia secara utuh. Aborsi pada saat bayi berusia 7 hari, dianggap membunuh manusia. Para siswa saling berbisik dengan temannya dan berkata’ iya yah, kenapa ga mikir ke situ dulu’.

Jika kita melihat bagaimana pemerintah menggunakan aborsi sebagai alat untuk menekan jumlah penduduk. Maka aborsi yang diterapkan di negara tersebut tidak akan bertentangan dengan value, norma dan keyakinan yang dimiliki rakyatnya. Misalnya jika 1 hari pembuahan dianggap sebagai telah terjadi manusia, maka aborsi yang dilakukan dalam bentuk ‘lain’. Misalnya penggunaan aborsi sebelum masa pembuahan tiba, ambil saja penggunaan pil KB sebagai contoh.

Kegiatan menggali pengetahuan siswa berkenaan dengan sebuah topik, selale merupakan kegiatan yang menarik untuk dicermati. Guru bisa belajar dari kegiatan ini. Misalnya saja, saya dapat mengenal apa pandangan siswa mengenai aborsi dan apa ketidaktahuan mereka menyoal aborsi. Selain itu, guru bisa tahu mengenai seberapa jauh siswa dari buku. Para siswa mengaku bahwa mereka mengajukan poin-poin mengenai aborsi bukan berasal dari hasil internalisasi membaca. Mereka mengakui bahwa membaca tidak membuat mereka terinspirasi untuk mengetahui lebih jauh tentang aborsi atau hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan fenomena sosial lainnya

Saya menutup pembelajaran hari ini dengan meminta mereka menulis jurnal. Pada buku jurnal saya ajukan agar mereka menuliskan apa pendapat mereka mengenai ‘cara pandang yang berbeda antara guru dengan siswa mengenai sebuah topik, seperti yang terjadi pada topik aborsi misalnya’.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

ASA BODO EUNG…

 Asa teu ngarti ku awak sorangan. Hémeng.

Geus ampir sabulan ieu asa bodo. Anéh puguh gé. Tapi lamun enya bodo, piraku kuring bisa jadi guru SMA. Matak ku pamaréntah dib ere eska ngajar jeung dipercaya sina ngajar gé, meureun teu bodo. Atuda maénya jelema bodo bisa ngajar. Kuring tacan manggih laratan ti mana éta rasa bodo téh jolna.

Kuring ogé asa teu rumasa pinter deuih. Asa teu bararisa nanaon téh. Geura éta waktu minggu kamari aya babaturan nu nanya cenah kahayang manéhna teh kieu-kieu-kieu, kuring jempé wé, ngadéngékeun naon kahayangna. Kuring aslina mah teu ngarti-ngarti acan kana naon nu diomongkeun ku manéhna téh, tapi teu wasa mun wakca, ‘hampura, teu bisa nulungan, kuring mah teu ngarti-ngarti acan kana omongan manéh téh’.  Ngarah teu matak sediheun teuing nu nanya, nya kuring ngajawab kamana we ceuk uteuk, duka énya bener- duka ngacapruk, kuring teu bisa nanggung jawab kana omongan sorangan.

Nu kuring héran kacida, naha batur maké percaya kana omongan kuring. Aduh… ieu mah bener-bener matak lieur.

Kuring ngirimkeun artikel ka koran Pikiran Rakyat dua kali. Dua kalianana taya nu dimuat. Teuing salah ngirim, teuing salah format, teuing salah alamat e-mailna. Tah mimiti katingali bodona téh, heueuh? Kuring nalungtik, naha ari nu batur mah bisa dimuat (kalayan gancang atawa henteu, sabaraha kali ngirimna, kuring teu nyaho, da teu aya nu wauh kasaha-saha nu nulis dina eta koran). Ku kuring di ilo, di talak di tilik, asana mah tulisanna teh, asa kitu we, teu jauh beda jeung tulisan kuring. Meureun pedah tulisan kuring mah ‘seurieus’ teuing. Ah ada asa biasa-biasa wae. Misalna we kuring ngomongkeun kaprihatinan ngeunaan bangsa urang anu cenah aya di tempat nu panghandapna dina kabiasaan maca, majar cenah mun dirata-ratakeun salambar dibaca dina dua minggu. (Subhanalloh! Sesuatu banget, mun ceuk Syahrini mah) Nya kuring teh ngomentar kana eta kaayaan bari jeung nawarkeun solusi. Rarasaan mah normal tulisan teh, tapi duka atuh lah, meureun koran mah lain kitu kahayangna.

Terus kuring gé wawaniaanan miluan lomba menulis keberhasilan guru tingkat nasional. Kalayan taya bimbingan jeung kanyaho. Kuring ngagutrut nulis, méakeun waktu ampir dua mingguna. Ngadeluk we nyaritakeun kumaha ngajar kuring nu dianggap ‘berhasil’. Nulisna nuturkeun galur nu émbarkeun dina internét we. Cenah mun meunang mah ké dibejaan. Aipek teh, lapur taya nu ngabejaan meunang henteuna. Meureun nya teu meunang tea we. Kuring ngukur ku rarasaan deui baé, asana tulisan teh teu goréng-goréng teuing.  Asana mah kaharti mun dibaca ku nu lain ahli pedagogik gé. Ngan meureun can waktuna kuring leupas tina ngarasa bodo. Kajadian ieu teh asa nguatkeun mun kuring teh enyaan bodo.

Ayeuna kuring ngarasa leuwih bodo ti batan saméméhna alatan teu ngarti kana naon nu kudu ditulis dina Research Based Paper (RBP). Kuring dititah nalungtik sakola rintisan Berstandar Internasional (RSBI). Kuring ngadatangan RSBI nu aya di kabupaten kuring, geus ampir sabulan kaduana kuring meunang sababaraha lambar kertas ti guru-guruna nu dianggap penting keur dijadikeun data, ku kuring difoto kopi, dipindahkeun kana lambaran Excel, ngarah bisa utang-itung langsung. Heup we nepika dinya. Ayeuna kuring ngajejentul mikiran kudu kumaha nganepikeun eta data sacaca deskriptif tina data kuantitatif ngarah aya mangpaatna pikeun pendidikan, utamana keur bahan pamikiran sabab RSBI teh geuning teu sapinuhna lungsur langsar kayaannana teh.

Dimimitiaan ku kapanasaran, dina peraturan mentri disebutkeun yen RSBI mah kudu ngagunakeun basa Inggris dina pangajaran sains jeung matematika, ari nu lian mah, make basa Indonesia atawa basa daerah ge teu nanaon. Tah panyeluk pamarentah sangkan RSBI make basa Inggris teh asa matak reuwas atawa ceuk istilah ahli mah ‘sudden jump’/luncat ngadadak, lantaran pikeun nangkep pangajaran dina basa Inggris tacan tangtu sa-efektif mun make basa Indonesia. Nu kudu ditalungtik teh naha basa ingris ngahambat teu kana ngartina budak dina pangajaran matematika jeung sains. Pan sarerea ge geus nyaho mun basa inggris mah kadudukanna teh minangka ‘basa asing’ di nagara urang mah.

Kulantaran basa inggris mah basa asing. Atuh exposure (naon basa indonesiana, kuring teu nyaho) nu jadi input pikeun budak diajar basa ingris oge teu loba. Budak ukur diajar 180 menit dina saminggu kana basa inggris. Sigana waktu nu samporet pisan pikeun budak bisa ngarti basa inggris kalayan sampurna (sound english). Guruna oge nya kitu keneh. Mun manehna kudu ngajar make basa inggris, meureun dua kali gawe. Manehna diajar heula basa ingris, kakarak ngajar.  Saupamana bae guru matematika, kudu bisa nepikeun pangalaman diajar ka muridna ku basa inggris. Barudakna oge, kudu bisa nunjukkeun kabisana dina matematika ku basa ingris. Padahal teu saeutik boh guru boh barudak nu teu resep-resep acan kana basa inggris teh.  Eh iwal ketang, saha nu nyaho guru-guru matematika jeung sains abad 21an atawa jaman kaayeunakeun mah, basa inggris teh geus jadi lalab sapopoe. Pan tivi, internet, BBM (Blackberry Massager), fesbuk, twiter, jeung jaringan sosial lianna make basa ingris.

Kuring ngadekul maca, susuganan matak nambahan ngarti kana urusan RSBI, tapi weléh asa teu beubeunangan maca teh. Eta gé ciri mun kuring bodo. Tapi asa teu pantes mun nyebutan sorangan bodo, tapi teu ngarti, supaya teu kasar teuing. Beuki loba maca, beuki teu ngarti. Puguh matak héran. Teuing pédah nu dibacana maké basa ingris, jadi kuring teu pati ngarti.

Tungtuna asa frustasi, mun ceuk budak jaman ayeuna  mah meureun bété. Huleng jentul wé gawe kuring teh, siga hayam leungiteun indung (paribasana keuna teu nya? Ah paduli teuing). Nyobaan nulis nu lian, asa teu metu. Heueuh puguh  gé araranéh jaman ayeuna mah, saban jelema kudu nulis, éh saban guru! Ceuk béja, di kabupaten Kuring aya kana 10 rewuna guru, mun 1 guru nulis 1 tulisan wé dina sataun, meureun dina sataun téh aya 10.000 rupa tulisan! Ramé dunya per’guru’an téh meureun. Sataun aya 10 rebu ‘publikasi tulisan’, dua taun bakal 20 rebu tulisan. Euh mana teuing resepna. Loba bacaeun, loba bongbolongan dina lebah ngatik barudak. Ulah cara nu kaalaman ku kuring baréto basa keur mimiti diangkat jadi guru. Lain guru kétang disebutna gé ‘honorér”. Emangna guru jeung honorer-guru teu sarua? Atuh henteu! Henteu na ge pisan. Guru mah ditujukeun keur PNS, ari guru nu can PNS mah disebutna honorer. Asa araheng nya sesebutan the. Teuing da kitu buktina. Kulantaran beda sesebutan, nya beda oge dina masalah beubeunangan, hak, gaul kaasup kakawasaan dina ngomong. Mun honorer mah dan acan jadi guru, teu meunang ngomong asal engab. Maksudna kieu, urang bere conto nu leutik we. Mun guru mah meunang nawar jadwal ngajar jeung bebas milih hayang ngajar di kelas mana. Tah mun honorer mah teu bisa kitu. Jadwal kudu narimakeun we sapamerena, rek dijadikeun ganjel keur ngajangkepkeun jam ngajar batur ge, kudu jempe we. Terus teu bisa tunjak tunjuk pipilih hayang ngajar kelas ieu atawa budak nu eta. Kelasna kudu sapamerean we. Nu teungteuingeun misalna we, ngajar kelas 1 dua kelas, ngajar kelas 2 sakelas, ngajar kelas 3 dua kelas. Jumlahna ngajar teh 5 kelas. Tapi tingkatan kelasna 3. Pan matak jangar eta teh. Jangarna kieu. Misalna we jam ka 1-2 ngajar kelas 1, jam ka 3-4 ngajar kelas 3, jam ka 5-6 ngajar kelas 2. Sapoe ngajar 3 kelas nu beda tingkatan. Hartina beda buku, beda materi, beda suasana psikologis, beda sagalana we. Ripuh mah mun teu apal jadwal jeung materi. Nu kahiji mah bisa ngakibatkeun kawiwirangan salah asup kelas, nu kadua mah bisa nurunkeun darajat kaguruan sabab salah mikeun materi ajar. Kuring ngalaman hal sarupa kitu, baheula. Tapi keur kuring mah teu matak nyeri hate. Nya dianggap latihan ngawanohkeun kana materi ajar we. Keur kuring lalanyahan jadi guru, aduh da matak lieur atuh ngajarkeun ‘subjanctive’ ka kelas akselerasi mah. Kuring paboro-boro jeung murid dina lebah paham kana materi ajar. Ngan lumayan we, kuring leuwih kolot sapeuting tibatan murid dina lebah ngulik subjunctive, nya lumayanlah teu matak ngerakeun teuing salaku guru honorer mah.  Cag. Ke diteruskeun deui….